Check out this retarded piece of shit article.
Can the author even be serious? Witness the insanity:
It’s hard to argue with a half billion incentives. But — aside from cash — it’s hard to see what satellite could do for Stern that podcasting couldn’t do better. If his primary motivation for ditching traditional radio wasn’t money but escape from the FCC’s censors, as I believe it was, the Internet would have been a better choice, hands down.
How about, letting him have an audience besides nerdy tech people? People primarily listen to Stern in their car where satellite radio works well, and is also far cheaper than any form of I-Pod or Mp3 player.
And that’s beside the point, because anyone who listens to Stern, knows that he was leaving because he was fed up with radio all together, and was going to retire because it wasn’t fun for him anymore. Then Sirius made an offer to him, told him he wouldn’t be censored at all, and he thought about it and decided that might make it fun again, so he did it. (And boy has it made his show fun again!) Sure he also got a lot of money, but the money was hardly necessary or motivating considering he could have lived out his life filthy rich even if he had just quit when his contract with Infinity expired.
Dumbass Tech Writer continues:
Podcasting’s reach now dwarfs traditional terrestrial radio, which in turn towers over satellite. Next to podcasting, even Infinity, the national network that formerly carried Stern’s show, looks like my old college radio station (before it added a podcast, that is).
Read that again: “Podcasting’s reach now dwarfs traditional terrestrial radio”. Asphinctersayswhat? How is that new batch of crack going, dude? I really think this is a case of a tech writer getting so caught up in his own hype that, well, he says a bunch of really stupid things. Let’s see here, in the world do you suppose there are more people with radios than computers? Yes. Are there certainly more people that listen to radios than have the high speed Internet connections required for podcasting? Yes. My point is made.
To be fair, Stern claims Sirius is trying to offer an online stream of his show, but even then, there’ll be no way to subscribe to it in a downloadable format. The promised stream will be delivered via a Sirius receiver, so it won’t be available in a readily consumable form.
Except by, oh, say, listening to it. Or hey, since it’s already plugged into your stereo, or in my case, my computer…you can use this simple piece of software called a “sound recorder” and store it forever. Except, it is LIVE the first time you listen to it, and you can call in and interact with the show. Such things frequently happen on Howards show, where he will be talking about someone, and they will hear it and call in. That doesn’t quite work with podcasting.
He goes on to talk about how it’s too bad that podcasters aren’t live, and that that is indeed a disadvantage compared to either terrestrial or satellite radio. A big one in fact. One that makes it absolutely not similar in any way.
Podcast producers could let listeners enter a lottery (perhaps by text message); the first thousand winners would get to hear the show in real time for five minutes, live, over their cell phones, with the potential to be chosen to have their call be patched onto the “air.”
Because that doesn’t totally sound like it would suck or anything. Wow, I won the lottery and I get 5 minutes of live talk show, on my cell phone…and I might even get to say something. Yeah…that’s pretty much just like listening to a live talk show.
As for getting the show to users without computers, Stern could have set the wheels in motion to distribute his show via Wi-Fi hotspots to simple, inexpensive MP3 players (possibly even privately labeled as a Howard Stern Cube or something of the sort). It’s not a perfect solution, but neither is making people pay $100 plus $10 per month to listen to a show that was free a few weeks ago.
Not a perfect solution at all. In fact, in my business we would call that a horrendously cludgey, bound to fail, non-solution. Furthermore, the show that used to be free and shared the same name, was a different show. Not to mention Sirius has good enough programming to make it worth the price even without Howard. And not all the sirius units cost $100, as it even says else where on the page…there are cheaper ones available all over the place…making the author seem a bit disingenuous.
I could go on to point out all the stupid things about this article, but I won’t bother. Just read it for yourself. There is at least one stupid, if not downright insane statement in pretty much every paragraph.
I’ve said it before, but I hate the term podcasting. Podcasting for one, does not require an I-Pod. I liked it better when it was called Audio Blogging. Because that is indeed what it is. Put an MP3 on your blog, and people syndicate it with RSS. Big fucking deal. It is not a breakthrough. There is no reason to get all excited about it. And there is definitely no reason to claim that it now “has a bigger reach” than radio. The only bigger reach podcasting has is the one up the authors ass, where he pulls these crazy thoughts from before writing them down in Wired.
As a comment on the articles page reads, “take the white buds out of your ears and join the real world for a while.”